Order of stay/moratorium under the Companies Act, 2013 prohibits the initiation of any proceedings; Parties cannot be referred to Arbitration: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High
Court ruled that the moratorium granted by the NCLAT, staying the institution
of suits and proceedings against the Corporate Debtor, after the resolution
process was initiated against it under Sections 241 and 242 of
the Companies Act,
2013, was akin to an order of moratorium passed under Section 14 of
the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Delhi High Court: In a case where a petition was filed under
Section 11 of the Arbitration and
Conciliation Act, 1996 for appointment of a sole arbitrator for the resolution
of disputes between the parties, a Single Judge Bench of V. Kameswar Rao, J.
held that the moratorium granted by the NCLAT staying the institution of suits
and proceedings after the resolution process was initiated under Sections 241 and 242 of the Companies Act, 2013 was similar to an order of moratorium passed
under Section 14 of the Insolvency and
Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).